Partnership for Peak Healthcare Performance PPHP home    DFWBGH home    Contact us    Site map  
Partnership for Peak Healthcare Performance A program of the DFW Business Group on HealthA program of the DFW Business Group on Health


Physicians - DFW Diabetes Care Reports

Frequently asked questions about the Partnership for Peak Healthcare Performance (PPHP)

1. What is the Partnership for Peak Healthcare Performance (PPHP)?
2. Which physicians receive DFW Diabetes Care Reports?
3. What patient data were included in the results?
4. How did the project assign (or attribute) patients to me?
5. What clinical quality measures are reported?
6. What data sources are used to develop these reports?
7. Which health plans participated in the data aggregation?
8. How are these data obtained and how is patient confidentiality protected?
9. How was the DFW Diabetes Care Report created?
10. How have the data been validated?
11. How reliable are the physician results?
12. What benchmark is used to compare my results?
13. How can I respond to this report or obtain additional information?
14. I believe I treat more patients than appear in my report. How do you account for the missing data?
15. How will these results be used?
16. What are the upcoming steps of this initiative in 2009?
17. Who do I contact if I have further questions or if I did not receive a DFW Diabetes Care Report?
18. I am interested in participating in future PPHP measurement and reporting work? How can I get involved?

1. What is the Partnership for Peak Healthcare Performance (PPHP)?
PPHP is a multi-stakeholder initiative to measure, report and improve care for chronic conditions, starting with a focus on diabetes care. The PPHP was formed by the Dallas-Fort Worth Business Group on Health (DFWBGH) in July 2007, and is a collaborative of physicians, employers, health plans, consumer groups and pharmaceuticals working collectively to improve the care delivered to diabetes patients in DFW.
A key component of the PPHP mission is measuring and reporting quality of care provided to commercially insured health plan members. PPHP aggregates data across five major health plans, including Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, CIGNA, Humana and UnitedHealthcare. These consolidated results are reported to physicians to provide a broader, more statistically significant view of the care their diabetes patients are receiving. The first set of diabetes care results were shared with physicians in May 2009, using calendar year 2007 commercial claims data. Thereafter, reports will be mailed in December for the prior calendar year (i.e. December 2009 reports reflect 2008 data).
Physicians have been integral participants on the PPHP's multi-stakeholder Leadership Team and working committees since the project's inception. Members represent physicians, medical groups, employers, health plans, pharmaceuticals and consumers. A Physician Advisory Council ensures that all committees benefit from physician input on issues related to physicians.
More information about PPHP can be found at www.dfwbgh.org/partnership.

Return to top

2. Which physicians receive DFW Diabetes Care Reports?
Reports are mailed to individual physicians who contracted with one or more of five participating health plans (including PPO and POS product lines) during the measurement year.
Using commercial claims data, PPHP measures and provides results to physicians practicing in the specialties of endocrinology, family practice, general practice, and internal medicine, and who have 20 or more commercially insured diabetes patients through the participating health plans. These physicians receive personalized DFW Diabetes Care Reports annually showing the collected data for diabetes care quality measures for certain of their commercially insured patients.

Return to top

3. What patient data were included in the results?
The eligible patient population includes commercially insured adult patients (age 18 to 75 as of December 31 of the measurement year) with PPO and POS coverage (excludes HMO), who were continuously enrolled in one health plan with no more than one gap of up to 45 days within the measurement year, and who were diagnosed with or received treatment for diabetes in the measurement year or the year prior.

Return to top

4. How did the project assign (or attribute) patients to me?
The patient attribution method was decided by the PPHP Data Collection & Aggregation Committee and approved by the PPHP Leadership Team.
Patients are assigned to the physician with whom they had the most visits within the measurement year. In the event of a "tie," the patient was attributed to the physician with whom s/he had the most recent office visit. The patient care specialties included were endocrinology, family practice, general practice and internal medicine.
Click on Methodology to learn more.

Return to top

5. What clinical quality measures are reported?
PPHP measures performance using clinical quality measures that are evidence-based, and nationally standardized and endorsed. The measures address diabetes care management. The measures were selected by the PPHP Performance Metrics/Public Reporting Committee and reviewed by the PPHP Leadership Team and PPHP Physician Advisory Council.
The four measures used are calculated using calendar year commercial claims data for the measurement year. All measures have to be capable of being calculated using the administrative claims data available from the five participating health plans.
The four measures are listed below.
 
A1c Test
LDL Test
Nephropathy Test or Treatment
Retinal exam
PPHP uses measure specifications from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) (www.ncqa.org).
Two outcomes measures also are calculated and reported even though the data are incomplete and cannot be considered reliable. The ability of claims systems to link lab values to patients and their prescribing physicians is limited at this time, however average A1c and LDL values are calculated for those values that can be captured.
Click on Methodology for more detail.

Return to top

6. What data sources are used to develop these reports?
PPHP uses administrative claims data from the five participating health plans to generate the quality care measures for patients continuously enrolled during the measurement year.
The data are drawn from ambulatory visits, lab and other screening services, and pharmacy claims. The data do not include Medicare, Medicaid, indemnity or HMO patients, or PPO/POS patients from non-participating plans.
There are data gaps in claims data due to incomplete claims records, coding errors, and errors in data handling processes, among other issues.
Missing physician identifiers on the claims records would exclude some patient events from being attributed to any physician. One of more of your patients may have had a visit with you, but if the claim was missing your physician identifier, it could not be linked to you for attribution.
As one step in improving the data, we are sending DFW Diabetes Care Reports to physicians and inviting them to comment on their results.

Return to top

7. Which health plans participated in the data aggregation?
Five major health plans in the DFW area participate in the data collection and aggregation. These are: Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, CIGNA, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare.

Return to top

8. How are these data obtained and how is patient confidentiality protected?
The five health plans voluntarily collect and summarize patient data at the physician level using a standardized data schema. These data are submitted to Austin Provider Solutions, Inc (a third party data management company contracted by DFWBGH) which aggregates the data across plans and reports results. All data are handled in strict compliance with HIPAA regulations. In order to protect patient confidentiality, no individual patient-identified data are collected.

Return to top

9. How was the DFW Diabetes Care Report created?
PPHP's Performance Metrics/Public Reporting and Data Collection & Aggregation Committees prepared the content and format of the DFW Diabetes Care Reports. Subsequently the report underwent numerous rounds of review and refinement involving input and feedback from the PPHP Physician Advisory Council and the PPHP Leadership Team. Members of these groups include the chief executives of several large physician organizations in DFW. Physician members of our working committees also received sample reports containing their own performance results for review and comment before the report formats were finalized.

Return to top

10. How have the data been validated?
The data collection and aggregation methodology was first conducted with calendar year 2006 commercial claims data. The results were reviewed and tested by PPHP staff, the PPHP Data Collection & Aggregation Committee and the health plan medical directors to look for and correct inconsistencies in the collection and aggregation process. Additionally, the regional results were compared to national benchmark data. Once satisfied with the methodology, the PPHP collected and aggregated calendar year 2007 data.
Click on Methodology for more information.

Return to top

11. How reliable are the physician results?
Reliability tends to increase as a physician's patient sample size increases. With the guidance of the PPHP Physician Advisory Council and the PPHP Data Collection & Aggregation Committee, we chose a minimum patient sample size of 20 for reporting results to physicians. Only those physicians within the designated practice specialties who had 20 or more diabetes patients attributed to them receive the DFW Diabetes Care Report.
Note that the calculated average A1c and LDL lab values are not considered reliable because for many physicians the number of records to which lab values can be linked falls below 20 patients. The number of patients whose lab values are available and included in the average is indicated in parentheses on the report.

Return to top

12. What benchmark is used to compare my results?
After reviewing a number of possible benchmarks, the PPHP determined (with concurrence from the PPHP Physician Advisory Council) that the most meaningful benchmark for a physician is the PPHP project-specific average results among all the DFW area physicians who were measured. The DFW Diabetes Care Report includes a benchmark comparison for each measure showing the all-DFW average.
There are few external benchmarks, as measurement at the individual physician level is relatively new. PPHP all-DFW average results are compared to the Commercial HEDIS audit means for PPOs (NCQA) and Commerical HEDIS 90th percentile for PPOs (NCQA) to gauge the reasonableness of observed performance rates at the population level. In general, DFW physician results compare favorably with these national benchmarks.

Return to top

13. How can I respond to this report or obtain additional information?
Physicians can provide feedback on the DFW Diabetes Care Evaluation by going to www.dfwbgh.org/pphp and following the Physician Report Feedback Form link.
Additional information including the project overview, methodology, and other details can be accessed at www.dfwbgh.org/partnership.

Return to top

14. I believe I treat more patients than appear in my report. How do you account for the missing data?
PPHP measurements only include commercial PPO and POS patients insured through the five participating health plans (Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, CIGNA, Humana and UnitedHealthcare). This excludes commercial HMO and indemnity, and Medicare/Medicaid patients. (Note that the calendar year 2007 date reported in May 2009 also included Aetna's indemnity patients.)
The eligible patient population includes commercially insured adult patients (age 18 to 75 as of December 31 of the measurement year) with PPO and POS coverage (excludes HMO), who were continuously enrolled in one health plan with no more than one gap of up to 45 days within the measurement year, and who were diagnosed with or received treatment for diabetes in the measurement year or the year prior.
To qualify, a patient must have had an ambulatory physician office visit during a specific time period. Some number of patients may be excluded because they did not have an ambulatory office visit during this period.
Missing or incorrect information on the claims records may have excluded some patients.
Although some patients may have received treatment from more than one physician, for the purposes of this study each patient is assigned to only one physician - the physician s/he visited most often during the measurement year.
See Methodology for more information.

Return to top

15. How will these results be used?
The Diabetes Care Reports are designed to inform physicians about the PPHP quality work, share their results on quality of patient care compared to their regional peers, solicit their feedback on the report, and begin the process of quality improvement. The first reports showing 2007 baseline data were mailed to about 1,300 physicians in May 2009. Thereafter, the PPHP will produce reports annually in December.
Regional summary reports and physician-identified results are reported to the PPHP for analysis and use in identifying opportunities for targeted care improvement efforts.
PPHP will not publicly report these results from the Diabetes Care Reports. Based on physician feedback on these reports, the PPHP committees, along with input from the PPHP Physician Advisory Council, will evaluate and refine the data collection and aggregation process.
The market place is moving toward transparency of quality data. The CMS has already begun reporting hospital quality statistics based on Medicare data. The PPHP anticipates publicly reporting physician-specific quality measures at some point in the future, but probably not before 2011. In the interim the PPHP will implement a number of programs targeted to the various stakeholder groups to help improve diabetes care management, including:
 
Patient and consumer education programs to help improve health care decision making and compliance with physician instructions;
Employer and health plan forums promoting value-based benefits design;
Physician practice support tools and forums to share best practices.

Return to top

16. What are upcoming steps of this initiative in 2009?
Test and adapt metrics and methods to achieve reliable results.
Implement programs targeted to the various stakeholders to help improve diabetes care management, including:
 
Patient and consumer education programs to help improve health care decision making and compliance with physician instructions;
Employer and health plan forums promoting value-based benefits design;
Physician practice support tools and forums to share best practices.

Return to top

17. Who do I contact if I have further questions or if I did not receive a DFW Diabetes Care Reports?
For additional information, please explore the other materials available on the www.dfwbgh.org/partnership website.
If you have 20 or more commercially insured diabetes patients through the five participating health plans, but did not receive a report, you may click on Request missing or duplicate report to request a report.
If you have unanswered questions, please contact us.

Return to top

18. I am interested in participating in future PPHP measurement and reporting work? How can I get involved?
PPHP welcomes your participation. Please let us know by contacting us.

Return to top

Portions of the PPHP website and materials related to the Diabetes Care Reports were modeled after those of the California Physician Performance Initiative of the Pacific Business Group on Health with their permission.
Physicians
News and Notes
New physician resource: Adherence Estimator patient survey and interpretation tools to help identify and motivate patients who are at risk for low medication adherence.
Road Trip! Destination: Peak Performance
worksite program piloting with local employers
Events
Feb. 24, 2010 — DFWBGH Corporate Benefits Forum
The Challenging & Costly Problem of Medication Non-Adherence, Robin DiMatteo, PhD.s
 

Partnership for Peak Healthcare Performance
11520 North Central Expy. Suite 201, Dallas, TX 75243Contact Us

Disclaimer: The Dallas-Fort Worth Business Group on Health (DFWBGH), the Partnership for Peak Healthcare Performance (PPHP), Austin Provider Solutions (APS) and any of their representatives are not responsible for any decisions made based on conclusions drawn from the information presented on this Web site or in the DFW Diabetes Care Reports.